The Birth of Tragedy; or, Hellenism and Pessimism (Version 2)
Friedrich Nietzsche
Lu par John Van Stan





This is one of Nietzsche's early academic writings - a scholarly theory about Ancient Greek theatre, specifically tragedies. In a nutshell, this work theorizes about why (Greek) spectators enjoy watching actors in a long series of scenes that depict human suffering (i.e., tragedy). It is a curious question, especially at the time since scholars generally thought of the Greeks as "A race of men, well-fashioned, beautiful, envied, life-inspiring, like no other race hitherto" (per Nietzsche's introduction). What did they need tragedy for? The question itself, and the path Nietzsche takes to answer this question, outraged the academic world. Later, an older Nietzsche criticizes this book himself and warns the reader that this text "should be treated with some consideration and reserve; yet I shall not altogether conceal how disagreeable it now appears to me, how after sixteen years it stands a total stranger before me." - Summary by jvanstan (7 hr 52 min)
Chapitres
Introduction by E. Förster-Nietzsche | 44:40 | Lu par John Van Stan |
An Attempt At Self-Criticism | 36:25 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Foreword To Richard Wagner | 3:15 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 1 | 14:35 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 2 | 10:40 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 3 | 10:45 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 4 | 12:11 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 5 | 18:20 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 6 | 12:00 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 7 | 16:15 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 8 | 20:40 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 9 | 18:25 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 10 | 10:55 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 11 | 17:05 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 12 | 18:10 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 13 | 10:25 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 14 | 13:55 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 15 | 16:15 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 16 | 18:30 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 17 | 17:45 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 18 | 13:12 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 19 | 24:30 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 20 | 8:50 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 21 | 21:25 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 22 | 13:40 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 23 | 13:40 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 24 | 13:55 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Chapter 25 | 5:07 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Appendix and Translator's Note | 16:37 | Lu par John Van Stan |
Critiques
One of Nietzsche's Greatest





Knight Of Lorelei (KoL)
I don't understand how people can say this book is weak when compared with the rest of Nietzsche's corpus. The views expressed in it are simply marvelous. As for the reader/narrator. It's one of the best works on this platform, a performance like this could easily be charged for, yet it's here for free, in the public domain. I can't give enough thanks for that.
More interesting than expected!





Tim S.
The reader does well conveying the message of these somewhat complex statements. Pauses at right moments, has nice inflection, etc.
Brilliancy of Nietzsche





Mikko
A great reading to start understanding Nietzsche's complex ideas in a more thoughtful way!
wow





Lord Invictus
a great work and we'll read
Needs more gay sex





Bill Cosby
Greeks had good and bad points. The problem with this story is it only focuses on the negative aspects of Greek society. Instead of focusing on the good aspect of Greek society, namely that they were homosexual, the author instead focuses on their bad aspects, namely their culture. Greek culture is inescapably white. This is problematic because whiteness and western civilization is now know to be entirely evil. Nietzsche needs to focus only on gay Greek homosexual orgies. If he did this the story could be made into a movie by Disney, and all would be good